Sunday, June 25, 2006

And Fun Was Had By All

The Downstate Democrats for Change (DDFC) hosted Trivia for Democracy at the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Hall of Local 309 in Collinsville on June 10, 2006. They organized the fundraiser for the Dan Stover for Congress Campaign. The event included all the bells and whistles for a really fun night benefiting a great cause -- raising money for the Danny Stover (D-Centralia) campaign in IL-19.

Some of the nicest, most hardworking people anyone could ever meet provided 50/50 Tickets, Attendance & Cash Prizes, Grab Bags, and a Silent Auction for 120 participants. The event raised over $2,000 for Stover’s goal of removing John Shimkus (R-Collinsville) from his IL-19 seat on November 07, 2006.

Members of the DDFC truly appreciated everyone who participated in the event and IBEW Local 309 for lending their Collinsville facility to support the Stover Campaign. Both the candidate and Mrs. Stover attended the event, provided assistance throughout the evening, and even stayed late to clean up afterwards.

Karen Sandefur has provided a link to some pictures from that night. She reminds everyone how important it is that Danny wins the election in November, so we can send him to DC and work in the best interest of ALL Americans. If you go to his website and read his stance on the issues our nation is struggling with, you'll see he has some real sensible approaches to them.

No arguments here only a lot of posts providing justification for her perspective.

Saturday, June 24, 2006

Midterm Reality Bites

Has anyone done a search on their dubious congressperson lately? Use Google and check out the sponsor link on the right.

The Drum Major Institute for Public Policy (DMI) is a non-partisan, non-profit organization dedicated to progressive public policy for social and economic fairness. the organization conducts research into overlooked, but important social and economic issues. The organization issued it's third-annual scorecard for the Midterm Middle Class Record for 2005.

John Shimkus (IL-19) received a score of 0 (an F obviously). No surprise there. He keeps company with his puppetmaster -- another one deserving a score of 0.

Jerry Costello (IL-12) received a score of 38 (another F). The Melissa Bean (IL-08) of So. IL needs to leave office just like his Republican counterpart.

The Middle Class is quickly disappearing for a reason. That reason is not just the Republican Party. Status quo Blue Dog Democrats (DINOs) give everyone a bad name.

John Shimkus has already pledged to run in 2008 after he pledged not to. Every IL-19 voter should realize how so very wrong this man is for Central and So. IL. Dan Stover is the better person for the job. Give the most lackluster member of Congress his walking papers in November.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Much Ado About a Non-Problem

According to Think Progress, the U.S. Senate needs one more vote to pass a constitutional amendment criminalizing desecration of the U.S. flag. James Madison and Thomas Jefferson developed the Bill of Rights. They did not feel the need for such language. No one said a word about the need for this law until the Civil War:

1862 Gen. Benjamin Butler, military governor of New Orleans, issues a decree prohibiting the display of any symbol representing an authority other than the United States and demands that the American ensigns … be treated with the utmost deference and respect by all persons, under pain of severe punishment.
In the 100+ years since, almost no evidence exists to justify wasting time and money on the flag amendment. Although, there are at least three reasons to oppose the legislation:
  1. Flag burning is a non-problem: As Sen. Robert Bennett (R-UT) has said, “I don’t want to amend the Constitution to solve a non-problem. People are not burning the flag.” One study found just 45 reported incidents in the over 200 years between 1777 and 1989, when the Flag Protection Act was first passed.
  2. Flag burning is protected speech: The Supreme Court has twice ruled that destruction of the flag for political purposes, although highly offensive to most Americans, is undeniably a political statement and a political expression.
  3. Amendment is vaguely worded: The amendment is “phrased in such broad and vague language” that it could could include censorship of images of the flag in works of art, advertising, or commerce. Last week, the Senate spent time debating whether “wearing a very skimpy bathing suit” decorated with the flag’s stars and stripes would constitute desecration.
The American Legion leads the fight for the Flag Amendment. Successful passage of the constitutional amendment means that for the first time in 214 years this country places a restriction on the sacrosanct Bill of Rights. It also means that the U.S. joins a select group of nations that have already done the same thing: Cuba, China, Iran, and Iraq under Saddam Hussein.

The Framers of the Constitution were Enlightenment Era philosophes. The Age of Reason provided the underpinnings for the colonials in the latter half of the 18th Century. Their European influences were Jean-Jacques Rousseau, René Descartes, and (above all) François-Marie Arouet -- Voltaire -- French author, humanist, rationalist, & satirist (1694 - 1778). In a February 6, 1770, letter to M. le Riche, Voltaire wote I detest what you write, but I would give my life to make it possible for you to continue to write. That is the true value of the First Amendment. The first because it is the most important one. Without it, nothing else really matters. It also sets the U.S. apart from every other country on the planet -- people expressing themselves without fear of persecution. It is worth fighting and dying for. Anyone desecrating the symbol of that freedom deserves pity, not jail time, and they will never understand why.

Only 45 people in more than 200 years is not enough justification for a constitutional amendment that is exactly opposite of this country's values. Members of Congress should put their energy to better use -- and there are a lot of social issues that are better uses.

Update -- Besides, it would be a shame for a federal court to find a sitting or (not soon enough) former president the first person guilty of flag desecration (could not happen to a nicer person).

The views expressed on this site belong to the Philosophe Forum without responsibility for false speculation, erroneous comments, the inability to comprehend written English, complete confusion, or the views & opinions of any website linked to & from this page (contact them, leave me out of it). Please send your messages to this address. All email addresses are confidential, published with permission. The Fair Use Statement is at the bottom of the sidebar.